Skip to content
conftrace_

peer review

79 papers

Papers

Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review ACL 2026 Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation Evaluation AAAI 2026 Beyond "Not Novel Enough": Enriching Scholarly Critique with LLM-Assisted Feedback EACL 2026 Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future ACL 2026 Position Paper: How Should We Responsibly Adopt LLMs in the Peer Review Process? EACL 2026 RATE: Reviewer Profiling and Annotation-free Training for Expertise Ranking in Peer Review Systems ACL 2026 ReviewGrounder: Improving Review Substantiveness with Rubric-Guided, Tool-Integrated Agents ACL 2026 A Peer-review Look on Multi-modal Clustering: An Information Bottleneck Realization Method ICML 2025 Benchmarking LLMs' Judgments with No Gold Standard ICLR 2025 Breaking the Reviewer: Assessing the Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review Under Textual Adversarial Attacks EMNLP 2025 Can LLMs Identify Critical Limitations within Scientific Research? A Systematic Evaluation on AI Research Papers ACL 2025 CLAIMCHECK: How Grounded are LLM Critiques of Scientific Papers? EMNLP 2025 CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review ICLR 2025 Generative Reviewer Agents: Scalable Simulacra of Peer Review EMNLP 2025 Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort? COLING 2025 LazyReview: A Dataset for Uncovering Lazy Thinking in NLP Peer Reviews ACL 2025 Learning from Committee: Reasoning Distillation from a Mixture of Teachers with Peer-Review ACL 2025 LLMs as Meta-Reviewers’ Assistants: A Case Study NAACL 2025 Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews EMNLP 2025 PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews NAACL 2025 PiCO: Peer Review in LLMs based on Consistency Optimization ICLR 2025 ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews EMNLP 2025 SEAGraph: Unveiling the Whole Story of Paper Review Comments IJCNLP 2025 STRICTA: Structured Reasoning in Critical Text Assessment for Peer Review and Beyond ACL 2025 The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review’s Utility for Authors EMNLP 2025